|
Saphire Sings the Blues by JOHN YATES |
Remember the last time you listened to Bessie Smith sing the blues. Close your eyes and hear her wail. Guttural voice. Hips swaying. Sugar in her bowl. Eyes burning through you. It’s easy to love Bessie Smith’s music since she’s conveniently dead. You don’t have to worry about waking up one morning and finding her laying in bed next to you, singing up her soul from the depths, taking your measure and turning it into song. Legend has it that Bessie Smith died because she was turned away from an all-white hospital, and was sent to a pauper’s hospital many miles away. White folks didn’t want to deal with the fact of her existence – or the meaning of her genius - while she was alive.
Things haven’t changed much. The streets are a part of America that most people today would rather forget. Our radio stations play hip-hop music, but the world of modern poetry stays off the sidewalks and huddles over pots of gourmet coffee in quaint university district cafes. What if I told you that one of the very finest poets in America is – right now – walking the streets in a southern city, and almost no one has ever heard her name? What if I told you that, if you would dare to enter her world, she might take your measure and make you into a poem straight from her gut? She is not conveniently dead
Her name is Saphire, and that’s the only name you’ll get. She is not Bessie Smith, but if you take a healthy dose of Bessie and mix it thoroughly with equal measures of Leonard Peltier, Lauryn Hill, John Brown, Crazy Horse, Muhammed Ali, Janis Joplin and Nina Simone, you’ll get a pretty good idea of what Saphire’s poetry is like. If you would care to look closer, you might see her sashaying down the street with one of her three pitbulls, swinging her hips to the rhythm of music in her head, focusing on you with eyes like a tiger. The way she moves, you know that she could break a strong man’s back, or his heart. Saphire is a Woman, spelled with a capital “W.” If you can’t deal with that, go somewhere else and read Sylvia Plath.
Listen to her rock.
Rodeo
Tricks
HE
rode side saddled,
'headed' me and wrapped his strap
round tight for a thrashing that
drug him down horses high
to strawberries
enduring my rage ,
he entered the coveted walls
of cowboy fame and buckled belt
for laying me dusty down
in seven seconds, heeled
rope burnt and somewhat
pissed
Saphire’s
poetry definitely is not for the faint of heart. She can be bold and boisterous,
bad and brazen, but that’s not all of her. Contained with equal ease in her
work are heartbreak and love, wistful longing and fiery anger, cynicism and
gentleness, spiritual searching and connection, and an encompassing compassion
for the legions of shattered souls who walk the dark and brutal streets of
America with her. Perhaps no one has written more honestly, eloquently and
evocatively about the inability to love at the deepest levels. Her poems are
rewarding in both substance and style. Meaning is at the heart of her work, and
her poems are at the same time deeply enigmatic and crystal clear. Her voice is
passionate, incisive and without pretension, delivering complex yet clear
imagery through language that vibrates in intensity and is metered to the rhythm
of hand drum, hip-hop and chant. While her brilliance is sometimes flawed by a
lack of discipline, it is her brilliance that stands out in the end. She is a
powerful antidote to the kind of technically perfect but meaningless poetry that
predominates in the modern era. She is guilty of excess, but innocent of guile.
Her voice is her own. There is nothing else like it anywhere.
Saphire also
is an artist, and her digital work is exhibiting increased technical ability,
coherence and focus of vision. Much of her artwork involves a series of
self-portraits, but she also paints impassioned digital collages of subjects
ranging from child abuse to men who frequent prostitutes.
| The
People’s Press Saphire’s
poetic world is the Internet. She has not sought publication in print
journals, and is not part of anyone’s definition of the literary
establishment. Most of her work is displayed in a poetry forum she
facilitates called “Blunt Trauma” (this site can be accessed at http://www.pub15.ezboard.com/bblunttrauma).
Dozens of her poems are displayed on active and archived forums on this
site. She also has posted some poems on other poetry message boards. I
discovered her work by accident, after she wrote me an email criticizing a
posting I had made on another message board about an unrelated topic. The
Internet is the outlaw of the literary world. Internet journals are not
taken as seriously as their older cousins in print, and few major awards
are given to work that appears in online journals. Literary message boards
(of which there are hundreds) are virtually ignored. There has been great
reluctance on the part of the literary establishment to grant recognition
and respect to work that is published online. Online journals clearly are
seen as second class citizens in the arts, if not just a hair’s breath
above the untouchable caste. It
certainly is true that there is much literary chaff, and little wheat, on
the Internet, but I would say that the same thing is true of the most
prestigious literary journals (and not by too much lesser of a degree).
One only needs to pick up a copy of a major literary journal from a decade
ago to discover that most of the names of the contributors are
unrecognizable today. Most of the writers, poets and artists who were
featured 10 years ago apparently are forgotten now, and most probably
should be forgotten. The odds of finding memorable writing do not seem any
better in contemporary print journals, as most of the featured work is
both quite forgettable and best forgotten. The amount of chaff does not
determine the value of the wheat, and there is no logical case to be made
for ignoring the Internet as a showcase of worthy literature and art. Perhaps
the real reason why the Internet is ignored is more a matter of power than
substance. Print journals and academic critics simply do not want to
relinquish their immense power to define and control the arts. The
literary establishment always has been very cliquish, and certain
individuals or groups become powerful arbiters of taste, content and form.
With Machiavellian resolve, they refuse to give up even a small piece of
that power, and strongly resist any idea or work that does not conform to
the accepted norm of any given era. That is why many writers and artists
who are considered great today, were seen as outcasts when they started
breaking the rules of the accepted canon of their era. That is why many
great writers and artists spent half their lives starving to death (and
that’s if they were luckier than most). It also must be said that
virtually all great writers and artists broke the rules laid down by their
predecessors and contemporaries. Some achieved acceptance after many years
of neglect, and many others died without having found that acceptance. Until
quite recently, it was very difficult for literary outlaws to mount any
kind of significant challenge to the establishment. Some people have tried
private publishing, and many small presses and journals were formed over
the years. Few survived, and almost none thrived. Many exceptional writers
waited decades to see their work in print, provided they had the
perseverance and courage to keep flailing at windmills until they found a
champion in high places. In the modern era, the economics of print
publishing, the control of distribution by the major publishing houses and
a rapidly shrinking number of independent booksellers, have come close to
becoming an insurmountable barrier to the literary rebel. A cynical quip
in the newspaper business is that there is freedom of the press, for
anyone who owns one. The
Internet has begun to pry away the fingers of this stranglehold on
publishing. Today, anyone with $100 can buy a good used computer. Another
$50 a month can buy a phone line and dial up connection in most places.
Computers in public libraries could eliminate even this small expense.
There are several companies that host free websites, and many more web
hosts charge only small monthly amounts. Message boards, egroups and blogs
generally can be had without any cost at all. Many of these hosted sites
do not require more than basic computer skills to upload anything to the
web. The bottom line is that the Internet today allows virtually anyone to
publish literature and art as they choose, at minimal cost and, at least
theoretically, that could be viewed by an audience that is many times
larger than all of the print literary journals in America combined. It is
not surprising that the arts establishment is threatened by the Internet,
or that those in power (ranging from governments to religions) constantly
talk of the alleged need to control unhindered access to the web. For the
first time in history, the Internet has provided what can truly be called
a people’s press. We can read what we choose, write what we choose, and
develop marketing skills to reach hundreds, thousands or even millions of
people. In the world of the arts, the Internet has the potential to strip
away power and control from the literary establishment, if prevalent ideas
do not hold water in truly open discourse and debate. The ability to
control is slowly being replaced by the necessity to persuade. It also
is true that work on the Internet lacks the sense of permanency of a book,
or even a magazine. Online work can be erased by a few strokes on a
keyboard, or obliterated by the bankruptcy of a hosting company. It is
possible that one day we will see a marriage of the two worlds, where the
literary work that stands the test of open scrutiny on the Internet is
collected for enduring print publication. Saphire’s
work is emerging during this era of transition, when the power of the
literary establishment to control print media is being ameliorated and
possibly replaced by the much more democratic milieu of the Internet.
Perhaps a few years ago, her work might have been embraced for all the
wrong reasons, during the era when being non-white, female, disadvantaged
and victimized scored many “brownie points” with the critics, and
profits for the publishers. But tastes have become jaded and times have
changed. Today, Saphire is a poetic outlaw who flies in the face of
current literary fashion, which advocates sterile writing and deliberately
shuns meaning and impact. Her work must survive on its own merits, and
develop a small army of articulate and persuasive advocates on the
Internet to smash through the walls surrounding the barons of print. I
believe it has the merit to do just that, and the potential to break
significant new ground through a potent combination of a visionary
revelation, a stunning sense of life, compassion stemming from both
personal and spiritual roots, natural language and meter, and refined use
of form and imagery.
|
Origins
and Essence
The essence
of Saphire’s poetry arises from her origins and experiences. While this essay
does not pretend to be a biography, her life cannot be separated from her work.
My understanding of her life is based on several conversations, an exchange of
correspondence, and a substantial body of journal entries. I have made no
attempt to corroborate the information she provided, and have taken her word. In
many cases, she made it clear that she did not want me to publish certain
identifying information about her, as she has concerns about her own safety. I
do not have a problem with this, as the only purpose biographical material
serves in a critical essay is to deepen one’s understanding and appreciation
of her work.
There is a
miraculous aspect to Saphire’s poetry, in the simple fact that it exists at
all. It is almost miraculous that she survived to reach adulthood with body,
mind, spirit and psyche reasonably intact, and it is even closer to the
miraculous that she is able to write eloquent poetry: she was barely able to
read or write only two years ago. In two years’ time, she has learned to read
and write in English with great sophistication. For the most part, she taught
herself everything she knows about the language. A close friend, Karen Barker,
inspired her to write poetry, and Saphire persevered at least in part because
she wanted to write poetry as a memorial to sharing life on the streets with a
woman who was very close to her. It can be said that much of Saphire’s work,
both in poetry and life, exists as a way of honoring her love for this young
woman, Cheyenne, who died of a drug overdose. It is not an exaggeration to say
that Saphire’s poetry is a shattering and dramatic testimony to the power of
love and devotion in the human heart.
At this
point, it must be emphasized that my appreciation for Saphire’s work is not an
act of charity, and has nothing at all to do with bleeding hearts. I do not see
her work as primitive chic (in the sense of the recent vogue of Haitian
painting) or as a sociological statement. Instead, I see it as highly
sophisticated poetry that can stand on its own - without apology - next to the
work of any poet in America. If anything, her “ghetto” background has
enriched the meaning, imagery and language of her poetry to a level far beyond
what one most often reads in renowned literary journals. I like her work because
she is a very good poet who is worthy of recognition.
Saphire (this
is how her name is spelled) was born and raised on an Indian reservation, and
her ethnic heritage is mixed Native American and Black. She grew up speaking
only Spanish and some of the Cherokee language, and could not speak English when
she entered school. Her childhood was economically impoverished, and she
describes her home life as very abusive. She did poorly in school and reached
eighth grade by default (“I was doing other things,” she wrote wryly).
At age 13,
she ran away from home and made a life for herself in the streets. Life in the
streets for Saphire was, at times, filled with ugliness, drugs and violence, and
sometimes she survived in any way she could. There also was much beauty and
intensity in some of the human relationships she developed on the street –
friends, lovers and protectors who took her under their wings. Life on the
streets would destroy many people, but it made Saphire strong, courageous and
capable of deep intimacy on many levels. It also made her capable of anger,
violence and revenge. She acknowledges these things in her journals, but adds
prophetically, “our darker side can b(e) used for good…the dark is no(t)
always a ‘bad’ thing.” Cheyenne’s addiction kept Saphire on the streets
beyond the time she knew she should move on, but she could not abandon her close
friend. Love and loyalty were not enough to save Cheyenne, but a resilient sense
of life and self-esteem were enough to allow Saphire to escape the harshness of
ghetto streets. She also wisely knew that she didn’t have the skills to do it
on her own, and credits a loyal friend, identified only as “Jack,” as having
taught the two young women the rudiments of reading and writing in English, and
also for “forcing” them to take jobs in construction to learn how to
survive.
After
Cheyenne’s death, Saphire found a job as an independent contractor installing
communications cable, now owns a house in a middle class neighborhood (which she
refers to as “the pink world”) and makes enough money to save for future
goals, and also to fund a project to help street people. She would not discuss
the specifics of this charitable project. Today, she gives much credit to the
support and encouragement of others, and especially to poets Karen Barker and
Andrew Bryan Carson.
Saphire’s
use of language continues to develop, and a dictionary is her constant
companion. She looks up any word she doesn’t know and learns it. In
conversations via online messengers, she refers often to the dictionary and also
asks people to explain how they use a word or phrase. Writing formally continues
to be hard work for her. In conversation, she often prefers to loosen up and
write in the language and style of the streets. In a very real sense, formal
English for her is a third language – after Spanish and ghetto English. It
cannot be emphasized too much that Saphire’s gifts for poetics and language
are almost entirely the product of her own mind. She has read very little and is
not familiar with the work of other major modern poets. Her reading is confined
almost exclusively to the work of contemporary young poets who write on message
boards on the web. In that her gifts are a combination of natural insight and
natural language, in a very real sense Saphire’s work takes poetry back to its
human roots and essence. This is very significant as counterpoint to the
intellectualized, formalized and utterly sterile atmosphere of most contemporary
poetry.
She is sick to death of “the pink world,” with its meaninglessness, endless rules and isolation. She wants to save up more money and, as soon as possible, get out. In looking toward the future, she expresses ambivalence. She feels a strong need to do something to help people on the streets, and to do something significant to combat child abuse and to help heal its victims. She also feels the call of wild lands, and to a spiritual way of life that is surrounded by the power and beauty of nature, and close to the Earth. The spiritual and at times almost shamanic aspects of Saphire are essential to an understanding of how she sees herself.
A
Sense of Compassion
The abuse of
children – be it sexual, physical or emotional – is a focal point of
Saphire’s sense of compassion in her poetry. Her compassion extends both to
abused children, and also to the scarred adults they become. It does not extend
to the abusers (she calls them “perps,” or perpetrators), to whom she
responds with rage that comes close to being projected into violence, and it
only rarely extends to herself.
Her poem,
“shake me baby dolls (sold out everywhere)” is a wry and poignant portrait
of abuse. This poem is based on the image of a toy baby doll that is extended
into the realm of the universal.
shake
the baby and hear her cry
complete
with sucking sounds, interchangeable eyes
…SHAKE
until she says
‘I’m
sorry’
…molding
her pleasure in brutality for life
evolving
her into a battered wife
Not
surprisingly, Saphire named this poem as one of her three favorites among her
own work. Her other two favorites are poems about intimacy: sharing and the
inability to share at the deepest levels of friendship and love between women
who were abused as children.
Her sense of
outrage about child abuse is reflected in a journal essay entitled “A
Survivor’s Address.” Alluding to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on
America, Saphire says our nation is forgetting about the real terror we face –
child abuse - and ignoring the real war on terrorism, which is to protect
children. She calls the national war on political terrorists “only an opening
set for the coming…inescapable wrath of unprotected children, ignored.” This
invisible terrorism causes our society to ignore the plight of millions of
children who are “raped, molested, beaten, programmed, verbally hijacked,
Xposed, videotaped, sold, harmed, mutilated, sodomized, starved, neglected,
rejected, blamed, hurt.” By
ignoring these children, she wrote, we are ignoring our own future and filling
it with dysfunctional families, decreasing prosperity, and a rise in anger,
violence and sorrow: “the pedophiles and rapists of tomorrow – the
terror….” She reacts with anger to claims about a reduction in child abuse,
saying that these numbers are utterly hollow when more than half of the children
born in America still face the terrorism of abuse.
The poem,
“Validation,” is another of Saphire’s favorites. It is about the coming
together of Saphire and Cheyenne on the streets – two survivors of abuse
finding each other and colliding,
and we were HIGH
THIS was love, and
THIS WAS LIFE
and we were FREE
while we misdirected revenge
released the beasts…
we were hell
and we were wild
we were angry
and this was life
we were rage
and we were pain
we were fire
we were free
and we warmed our souls
beside infernos of
Validation
Moving beyond
the inferno of “Validation,” in “It’s Bethie’s Time to Fly,” Saphire
looks compassionately on a girl whose “sixteen years punched holes in her
heart” that she bandaged “with Jesus and art.”
The poem urges Bethie to “put that luggage down and fly,” even as her
life “speed burn(s) the dirtied tracks of her tears,” and to never look back
and never blame the past because she would use the past as an excuse for
failure.
Saphire only
grudgingly (if at all) extends that kind of compassion to herself. In “Liquid
Confessions,” she sees herself as broken, jagged pieces of a mirror, shattered
because her own image “gags me…
and it’s not that I was born ugly
it’s just that I have become it
becoming fear
shame
becoming a festering wound
growing
hard
calloused
empty…
In her
poetry, Saphire often sees herself as sterile, unable to bear fruit, be it in
the form of birthing a child or sustaining a loving relationship. “I do know
that delivering is always the task I can’t complete on a personal level,”
she wrote in her journal, “delivering love or delivering anything real at
all.” In “What I cannot Bear,” she berates herself for inseminating her
poetry with too much pride, conceiving it as a love for a person that is futile,
leaving
each
of these my
cold
babies
undone
locked
tight in mother’s womb
“Aborted”
speaks of a pregnancy when she was “too young” in the eyes of her mother and
the unborn child’s father, who “took that baby out himself.”
The poem ends in bitter irony and ambiguity:
he was mean
but perhaps she was the only daughter
to whom he’d EVER
shown mercy
mama knows best
Was the
daughter in the poem the unborn child, or was it Saphire? Or was it both? Was
the baby’s father also Saphire’s father? In the poem, Saphire leaves home
and finds love, but often thinks about the baby and
How lucky it was to have never breathed
Or opened its eyes to the reality
That it
Would
have real eyes to perceive